It’s well-known that social media profoundly impacts day to day life by shaping society and how we as individuals act. But consider this, do we impact social media? What customs have our morals and ethics brought to online life? Exchange is a concept embedded in human culture. The Silk Road, Pituri Road and Kula Ring are all examples discussed by Henry in her week 8 JCU BA1002 SP2 2020 lecture. How does reciprocity transfer onto social media?
Reciprocity
is a well-developed, observable theory. French sociologist Marcel Mauss in his
1925 essay The Gift claimed that gift exchange builds relationships between humans (Mathews, 2017). Throughout his career, he argued that
reciprocity always has sense of economic inequality and consequently the giver
is often morally viewed as superior hence, the gift itself is never ‘free’. Therefore,
the meaning behind a gift largely relies on the relationship between the two.
Furthermore, reciprocating reciprocity in various cultures is an act of
hostility and the incentive behind exchange is more than just unity (Henry,
2020). As reciprocity is a part of human nature it’s expected that it would be established
in today’s society, including on Facebook, a community of 2.7
million monthly active users (Statista
& Clement, 2020).
A culture and etiquette have grown alongside Facebook’s
users. According to Shukle’s 2015 blog post discussing this etiquette, it includes tagging
pages or friends who have no relevance in the post and ignoring Facebook
comments (click here to see
the full blog). Shukle doesn’t discuss the unspoken rules of
‘like for a like’ and ‘like before you share’. Many Facebook users get
annoyed when another user shares their content without liking or reacting to it
first and when friends stop engaging with their posts. The first user has put
content on their page for a purpose, this feeling of anger or frustration stems
from this purpose not being acknowledged, hence it being considered rude. This
may be excused depending on the relationship between the two people; it’s less
likely for a user to get mad at a partner or best friend over a like on Facebook
compared to an acquaintance. This exemplifies Mauss’s argument that gift
giving is never free and how the nature of exchange is dependent on
relationships.
Figure 1: (Beardly, n.d.)
Marketplace was introduced into Facebook in 2016, immediately becoming a focal point for exchange on the website. Another unspoken rule is that when a user receives the item for free they must show the giver respect. In Figure two you can see a post from the 14/09/20 taken from a Townsville buy, swap and sell page. Major details have been removed for privacy purposes. This item was listed for free and they’ve said Serious buyers only please.
Figure
2: (Anonymous, 2020)
This
shows us another form of social media etiquette. When someone is giving away an
item or offering it for a low price, it’s considered extremely rude to change
your mind about any aspects of the exchange. Hence the giver has more control
than the receiver and the product isn’t necessarily ‘free’ because if you act
unkindly the giver can change their mind. This is an idea from Mauss discussed
by Leche in his book Key Contemporary Concepts. Nevertheless, if someone gives, someone else
must receive. But at the same time, one gives in order
to receive (Leche, 2003).
It
can be inferred from these examples that, through exchange, we can shape social
media rather than it shaping us.
References
Anonymous. (2020). In Facebook:
Townsville Buy Swap and Sell.
Beardly, J. (n.d.). Jasper Beardly
- Sharing My POST WITHOUT LIKING I…. Memegenerator.Net. Retrieved September
16, 2020, from https://memegenerator.net/instance/50903644/jasper-beardly-sharing-my-post-without-liking-it-thats-a-paddlin
Henry, R. (2020). BA1002:
Our space: Networks, narratives, and the making of place; week 8 lecture
notes [PowerPoint file]. Retrieved from https://learnjcu.edu.au
Lechte, J. (2003). Exchange.
In Key Contemporary Concepts. Sage UK. https://search-credoreference-com.elibrary.jcu.edu.au/content/entry/sageukcc/exchange/0
Mathews, M. (2017). Gift giving,
reciprocity and the creation of trust. Journal of Trust Research, 7(1),
90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2017.1286597
Shukle, R. (2015). 12 Facebook Etiquette Mistakes You Want to Avoid. Post Planner. https://www.postplanner.com/blog/facebook-etiquette-mistakes/
Satista, & Clement, J. (2020, August 10). Facebook: active users worldwide. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/#:~:text=With%20over%202.7%20billion%20monthly


Hi Elena,
ReplyDeleteThanks for bringing the rules of social media etiquette to light, I hadn't really given much thought to their role in the exchange process. You also make some really excellent points about the unspoken expectations of reciprocity, in the form of manners and good behaviour, on marketplace. I think about this too with the introduction of features allowing you to rate and review your experience (as both buyer and seller).
I also found the section on social media rules interesting as it's definitely not something that I naturally think about.
ReplyDeleteReally enjoyed reading this.